All 50 states require a person to be 18 years old before entering a contract. Parental consent is required, but is it consent or coercion that is applied? 2015 Convention said that toddlers are protected by the goodness of their parents at Armageddon, but after that you could be held responsible if you are not baptized. “If you are old enough to drive, you are old enough to get baptized.”, etc. Fear of destruction at Armageddon, denial of getting a driver’s license and similar tactics are coercion.
“Contract coercion occurs when a contract agreement is entered into under conditions involving harm or threats of harm. State and federal laws require contracts to be entered into “knowingly” and “willingly” by all parties. Thus, if a party signs a contract due to coercion, the contract generally will not be considered legally enforceable.”
Imagine a class-action suit by ex-JW’s to have their contracts nullified. It would also automatically move the minimum age of baptism up to 18. Those of us who are shunned could no longer be shunned. The implications are interesting.
]]>At the end of the day, I hope that these kids will grow up & get educated at school about critical thinking skills & be aware of religious scams (cults) so that they can see the negative consequences of undue coercion. That way they can put more effort into humanitarian causes or the environment & science. We don’t need more people being trained to go around picking on other people about their faith, conning them to waste their lives on a fallacy or fancy buildings where people pretend to worship in. We need people that want to seriously help future generations. Religious scammers are not the answer. After all, Jesus said “you received free, give free”.
]]>I’m happy he puts it this way, the more the mystery of the “faithful slave” is dropped, the easier people can recognize it’s a cult and following of men.
]]>