Why Jehovah’s Witnesses Have No Business Going Door-to-Door Preaching to Others

In most countries, Jehovah’s Witnesses have the legal right to go door-to-door for their preaching work. It’s not trespassing, as you are allowed to approach someone’s front door if you have valid business, and they are not soliciting, because they are not technically selling anything.

Legal rights aside, I’d like to discuss some personal reasons why I think Jehovah’s Witnesses have no business going in their preaching work, having public sermons from their podium, printing their literature, or even speaking to others about their religious beliefs.

Talking Without Listening

In my own home, there are actually very few rules to remember as a guest. Eat dinner in the living room, put your feet on the furniture; it’s pretty casual under my roof. However, one thing I insist on is that, if you’re not going to listen to other people, you don’t get to talk.

I’m sure we all know that type of person, the one who monopolizes the conversation, interrupts, bellows, and talks over others. They may even put a hand in someone’s face, or get up and leave when they cannot control what’s being said.

These types of practices are rude enough in everyday conversation, but when it comes to teaching people about the bible and telling them how to live, I don’t believe you should be allowed to talk if you’re not going to listen. You shouldn’t be allowed to teach and instruct and counsel, if you’re not going to take in a dissenting opinion.

Despite the hours they put into talking about the bible, trying to speak to Jehovah’s Witnesses and share your own opinion is a near impossibility. During their meetings held throughout the week, there is no room for a personal opinion. Written material is presented with questions and answers already spelled out for the audience; individual input is not allowed.

Jehovah’s Witnesses also do not entertain dissenting opinions online. Try joining a Facebook page set up by Witnesses and pointing out an error in their beliefs, or raising an objection, and chances are you’ll be banned from the page within hours. I know, because it’s happened to me many times over, despite being polite and respectful in my comments.


They’re not very literate or intelligent about how they try to toss you off Facebook, but they would rather do this than listen and ask questions.

It’s also not possible to actually raise an objection or mention outright errors in their teaching when Jehovah’s Witnesses preach to people at their homes. If you ask about the qualifications of the men who translated their bible, about their changing beliefs, or object to any of their doctrines, they typically terminate the conversation or your bible study. Their reasoning is that they are looking for “honest-hearted ones,” but in my opinion, this is a cop-out, and an insult. A person who objects to the JW interpretation of the bible may be very “honest-hearted,” and may have very valid, sincere questions or concerns. However, Jehovah’s Witnesses typically dismiss these people when the questions or objections become too uncomfortable, or when they don’t have answers, rather than actually listening to them and considering their words.

Guided by Holy Spirit?

Some Jehovah’s Witnesses might immediately object to this by saying that their leaders are directed and guided by god’s “holy spirit,” so it’s not up to anyone else to disagree with them. One problem with this thinking is that the information taught by Jehovah’s Witnesses has been outright wrong, many times over. They have predicted the end of the world as coming in 1914, 1925, 1935, 1975, then before the end of the 20th century. They have changed their doctrine on blood transfusions and their beliefs about homosexual acts being considered adultery when committed by married persons. Please see this website for a more detailed explanation of their changed teachings.

More and more cases of pedophilia are being revealed within the ranks of Jehovah’s Witnesses, even being committed by those who are elders and ministerial servants (like elders in training), despite the claims that these men are “appointed by holy spirit.” Domestic violence and child abuse is common in far too many homes. Many elders also endorse or hide these acts when committed by others.

The claim made by Jehovah’s Witnesses of being “guided by holy spirit” is flimsy at best. Holy spirit is not going to guide you to an understanding of a certain doctrine that is wrong and that needs changing down the road. You can’t tell me that the holy spirit is behind the appointment of elders in the congregation who are wife beaters and child molesters, and that magic holy spirit wouldn’t help them to make policies and decisions that allow these practices to flourish in the organization. This excuse, that they should be doing all the talking while everyone else just listens because they have holy spirit, is absurd.

Dangerous Advice and Teaching

Another reason that I personally believe Jehovah’s Witnesses should not be doing all the talking is that the advice and demands they make are often shortsighted, and even downright dangerous. However, they don’t have a process in place for anyone to point this out to them.

As an example, consider the articles I have posted in the Women category of this blog. Jehovah’s Witnesses have equated rape to fornication, insisting that women scream and fight, even to the death; a woman faces the threat of shunning if elders decide that she did not resist enough during an attack. As I’ve brought out, this is based on a law given to Israel, which Christians are no longer obligated to observe, and it even goes beyond that law. Have Jehovah’s Witnesses ever considered that this is not only hurtful to women, but also a very serious sin on their part, in going beyond their god’s requirements?

asdwwwConsider, also, issues of domestic violence; Jehovah’s Witnesses encourage women to stay with abusive men in the hopes that these men will be impressed with their submissive behavior and become Witnesses themselves. They don’t talk about the many hundreds, if not thousands, of cases where this never happens, and where women and children are horrifically abused every day for nothing. Those women and children have no voice, no way of expressing their own opinions about their situation, or their experiences with how things happen in “the real world” of domestic violence and abuse. The Witnesses who give this counsel have an idealistic, Utopian idea of what life is like for these women, ignoring the terrifying events they go through every day.

They also never consider that this just encourages men to be abusive, as it simply rewards their abuse with a domestic slave who is powerless against him. If a woman were to die at the hands of her abuser, that would also make JWs blood guilty for encouraging her to stay, yet they still refuse to listen to any dissenting opinion about their teachings on this subject.

Teaching Religion

One of the most important reasons that Jehovah’s Witnesses shouldn’t preach to others is that they feel they’re the only ones who have the true religion, and will not hear anyone else’s views when it comes to god, the bible, and doctrine. They will gladly hand out literature and give presentations to anyone, even children, but don’t dare try to do the same to them! They will not listen to one minute of someone else’s beliefs, or even allow their children to be friends with nonbelievers, in case these ones try to teach them something other than the JW doctrine. Many Jehovah’s Witnesses even homeschool their children so they can control the information and religious beliefs to which they’re exposed.

However, as I’ve brought out, Jehovah’s Witnesses have been proven wrong when it comes to their beliefs in many areas, so obviously they are not the end-all experts they would like to think. Perhaps if they listened to others, they might see their own mistakes before they put them in print, and might even avoid being blood guilty in so many areas of their adherents’ personal lives.

Consider if this happened with a person, rather than a religion. If I gave advice to someone about their abusive relationship, and they wound up being killed by their abuser, or if I were a doctor and I was consistently wrong with every diagnosis, do you think I would be allowed to continue giving advice? At what point would people stop making excuses for my errors, or at the very least tell me to sit down and be quiet and listen to others? I can’t imagine why it would be any different for Witnesses and their beliefs, and their preaching work.

*** ***

Please share with others. Thank you.


3 replies »

  1. God sent his son into the world to save us from our sins. If God holds a mirror in front of you and says take notice and repent but all you can do is throw stones you condemn yourself. I don’t think Jesus went down easily, it takes a lot to speak out to the world to listen up. The problem is man follow man instead of turning to God through Christ for understanding, if we did we would easily recognize Christ and not crucify him. The conflict ends when you accept Christ fully and turn to God. There were very righteous man that were spokes people for Christ. It wasn’t their words or intuition, it was God speaking through them. This is true for all believers. So your response is very relevant to the law and Gods perfect Love. The real question is how many of us should take notice and repent? All of us. God is in full control.

  2. Just a small correction on the updated understanding of the “faithful and discreet slave”. The July 15th 2013 WT stated that the eight men of the governing body are the FDS, but they will be joined by the rest of the 144,000 in receiving the heavenly reward, and the task of ruling and judging. Great article!! Yes, a lot of talking, and virtually no listening!

    • The magazine says that the faithful slave would be appointed over all his belongings, and explains belongings:

      17 What do “all [Jesus’] belongings” include? Jesus did not qualify the word “all,” as if to limit his belongings to earthly things. In fact, Jesus has vast heavenly authority. “All authority has been given me in heaven and on the earth,” he said. (Matt. 28:18; Eph. 1:20-23) His belongings now include the Messianic Kingdom, which has belonged to him since 1914 and which he will share with his anointed followers.—Rev. 11:15.
      18 In view of the foregoing, what can we conclude? When Jesus comes for judgment during the great tribulation, he will find that the faithful slave has been loyally dispensing timely spiritual food to the domestics. Jesus will then delight in making the second appointment—over all his belongings. Those who make up the faithful slave will get this appointment when they receive their heavenly reward, becoming corulers with Christ.
      19 Does the faithful slave receive a greater reward in heaven than the rest of the anointed? No. A reward promised to a small group in one setting may ultimately be shared by others. For example, consider what Jesus said to his 11 faithful apostles the night before he died. (Read Luke 22:28-30.) Jesus promised that small group of men that a fine reward awaited them for their faithfulness. They would share his throne of kingly authority. But years later, he indicated that all of the 144,000 will sit on thrones and share his rulership. (Rev. 1:1; 3:21) Similarly, as stated at Matthew 24:47, he promised that a small group of men—the anointed brothers who make up the faithful slave—will be appointed over all his belongings. In reality, all of the 144,000 will share his vast heavenly authority.—Rev. 20:4, 6.

      So they say they will be appointed over his belongings, even though the other 144,000 will have thrones. It can’t be both ways; one group can’t be over the other if they see themselves as equals. They also say this reward “may” be shared by others, not “will.” While they acknowledge some type of sharing of authority, they still reserve this special “appointment over his belongings” for themselves.

      If anything, it shows how confusing their beliefs are and how greatly they’ve changed over the years, and if they can’t explain them in clear language that everyone understands, they probably shouldn’t be thinking of themselves as such good teachers. Just my opinion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s