Australian Royal Commission Inquiry 2015

Member of the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses Lies About Corporal Punishment, Abandoning the Victims Yet Again

During the Australian Royal Commission inquiry, Jehovah’s Witness governing body member Geoffrey Jackson was asked by the Chairperson about corporal punishment, or physical discipline. The Chairperson referenced a scripture that talks about the “rod of discipline” and asked what that meant; his point was that the bible’s words may have been applied a certain way at the time it was written, but today, social standards have changed, so the application has perhaps changed.

During the course of the questioning, Jackson balked and avoided giving testimony about how Jehovah’s Witnesses view corporal punishment; then, when finally cornered, he did what Witnesses often do in such situations.

He lied.

Three times Jackson was asked if “the church” accepted corporal punishment; twice he avoided the question, and then, finally, during the third round of questions, he had the audacity to say that it was not accepted. Fortunately the Chairperson didn’t accept his answer at face value, and pushed the subject:

Capture corporal

Note, first, the way he tried to act as if the question of “Do you accept corporal punishment” meant him personally, when twice he was just asked if the church accepted it. Then he outright lied by saying that “no … not as an organization.” He then corrected himself and said that they don’t “encourage” it.

One of the most telling parts of this exchange is how Jackson avoided the question at least twice before being cornered; when you’re afraid to tell the truth, you may dance around the question, and then deflect the answer by pretending you thought the question meant something different. This is all done in the hopes that the person asking will drop the subject, accept your half-truth, or miss what you’re saying or trying to avoid saying.

Fortunately the Chairperson was too smart to fall for these immature, dishonest, politician-like techniques, and kept at the question. Even then, Jackson lied. He lied.

Anyone who has been one of Jehovah’s Witnesses will tell you that parents in the religion practice corporal punishment regularly, sometimes to an extreme degree. When I was an active Witness, parents were known for spanking their children with belts, wooden spoons, or their bare hands.

There was never a meeting that went by without the sounds of a child in the restroom, screaming from such a spanking. Sometimes parents wouldn’t even take them out of the auditorium but would smack, slap, yank on hair, or even pinch the children while they sat in their seats.

Lest you think this was only for major offenses, one woman I know started swatting her son when he was six months old. Six months. Still a baby who couldn’t walk, talk, or even use the toilet, but apparently he would do something that was worthy of a smack on his diapered behind.

The emotional toll from this type of “discipline” is very serious as I can attest, even though my mother never put a hand on me. She did, however, beat my brother with a cutting board that she had trimmed down to a paddle. I still get upset thinking about how viciously she would attack him with that thing, and him being a child half her size.

When deciding to write this column, I didn’t want my own experiences to be the only ones that demonstrated the extent of this type of abuse that was dished out as “discipline.” I put the following note in an ex-JW Facebook group:

Capture corporal

Here is a sampling of the responses that were posted:

Capture jw spanking 5

Capture jw spanking 6

Capture jw spanking 7

Capture jw spanking 8

Capture jw spanking 9

Capture jw spanking 10

Capture jw spanking 11

Capture jw spanking 12

Capture jw spanking 13

Capture jw spanking 14

Capture jw spanking 1

Capture jw spanking 15

Capture jw spanking 16

A Facebook group for Jehovah’s Witnesses in particular was also brought to my attention, and I found the following comments posted there by professed JWs:

Capture jw spanking 3

Capture jw spanking 2

I realize that some Facebook comments do not equate to an empirical study of how often Jehovah’s Witnesses spank or otherwise inflict corporal punishment on their children, but keep in mind that these Facebook accounts are all of real people with their names and profile pictures displayed; they’re not anonymous, trolling comments left at the end of some news article. They’re all different ages and from different areas of the world, and they all tell the same story of beatings and abuse that were common in the Kingdom Hall.

The fact that Jackson lied on the stand tells me that he knows how shameful their record is when it comes to protecting children from all sorts of abuse. His testimony went on to talk about the “spirit” of their publications in not encouraging corporal punishment, but when you have this long record of beatings disguised as punishment and the legacy of children traumatized by this, it’s obvious that your publications have failed in their “spirit.”

Yet, he doesn’t acknowledge that failure, not once. He does nothing, not with actions and not even his words, to protect victims.

Elders sit back and do nothing while children are being beaten, or are the worst offenders themselves when it comes to abuse, and Jackson pleads a case for the “spirit” of their publications. Rather than accepting any type of responsibility or accountability for the atmosphere created in Kingdom Halls and the vicious beatings that are all too common and which, like pedophilia cases, are ignored, swept under the rug, or put back on the victims as their own fault, he squirms and avoids the subject altogether, and then outright lies.

Like the pedophilia cases, he abandons the victims to this horrific treatment they face, and tries to make himself and the governing body look good by talking about the “spirit” of their literature, after outright lying. He does this, without one thought as to how it must make the victims feel, sitting on their bruised behinds and hearing the governing body say that they don’t “accept” corporal punishment.

If children get hit, slapped, spanked, beaten, and otherwise punished for minor infractions at the Kingdom Hall and for things like not being able to stay awake during long and lengthy meetings that put most adults to sleep, what should Jackson’s punishment be for lying? Maybe I should get my mom’s old cutting board and head up to New York and mete out some discipline myself. I mean that in the best “spirit” possible.

*** ***

Please share via social media below.


7 replies »

  1. While growing up in the JW religion my parents sat behind us 6 older kids. If we spoke, fell asleep, didn’t look up a scripture, was caught not paying attention they pulled the back of our hair. When we got home we got the beating of our lives. I mean not just a belt but the buckle, broomsticks, punched in the mouth if we talked back. One of my saddest memories was my mother telling us kids, she wished we lived in bible times so she could stone us to death. The reality of this religion is that all JW children should be taken from their parents and adopted out!

  2. Fortunately I wasn’t raised a Witness. But when I spent some time with a Witness family I was shocked at how the father hit his wife and three kids with a belt during “family Bible study.” If they didn’t answer, didn’t answer correctly, fidgeted, or laughed: they were struck with the belt. He also engaged in psychological punishment by having the kids write an enormous quantity of sentences by an impossible deadline (such as “I will pay attention at the kingdom hall.”) When they didn’t meet the deadline he would rip up their pages and pages of sentences and then assign them double the amount.
    In rural Minnesota I remember young children being sent into the woods to gather “switches” (small branches for their father to beat them with.)
    It’s also a lie about “the spirit of their writings.” Even the Insight on the Scriptures book — currently online — talks about it being a literal rod, and parents aren’t just “encouraged” to use it: they are mandated to use it:

  3. I remember a particular family who had two wee boys and when either of them acted up you could hear the WHACK from miles away and a child in obvious distress.Then everyone in the hall would be like: “Should we look round or express any kind of concern for the child?” But no, no. That’s for the parents to decide after all according to the WTBTS.
    A Child, clearly being abused in PUBLIC should NEVER be ignored, but within the walls of a KH, well then, that’s ok??????????
    The sooner this hateful “religion” is brought to it’s knees the better.

  4. I guess they forgot about the song in one of their song books from the 80’s… I believe the name of it was “Children, Gifts from God” my mom’s favorite line it it was – …..They are gifts from God, He says use the rod…..”

    • Yeah, how nice to have that right in a song with everyone thinking about literal rods and paddles being used on little children. What a great thing to sing about. So sickening and sad.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.