Australian Royal Commission Inquiry 2015

The Outrageous Hypocrisy of Jehovah’s Witnesses Checking Police Records of Pedophiles They Don’t Report to the Police

Barrister Angus Stewart, senior counsel for the Australian Royal Commission Inquiry Into Institutional Responses to Child Sex Abuse, has released his initial findings regarding their questioning of Jehovah’s Witnesses. (See this post to find out more about this inquiry and its purpose.) One thing I noted was on page 104 of his report:

Capture hypocrisy

First, understand that the Inquiry discovered that Jehovah’s Witnesses in Australia have had 1,006 reported pedophiles in their religion in the last few decades, with not one being reported to police by elders. Not one.

What Barrister Stewart is saying in the above section is that, yes, Jehovah’s Witnesses do perform a background, or “Working With Children Check” (WWCC) on potential elders, as legally needed. It is a law in some parts of Australia that clergy who work with children go through this vetting process before they can be appointed; visit this website to find out more about this check.

However, note Mr. Stewart’s statement about the hypocrisy of Jehovah’s Witnesses performing these police checks, while they themselves don’t report known pedophiles to the police! It’s obscenely brazen of Jehovah’s Witnesses to boast that they comply with the law by performing background checks, but then withhold the same information that should be contained in the database that is referenced for those checks. If Jehovah’s Witnesses were selling a product, it would be like them saying, “Of course our products are all safe, we’ve checked and there’s no record of anyone getting injured while using them,” while purposely not reporting the very injuries that they boast about checking.

Safety of Others

What is also especially shameful about this is that many of these JW men and women who are known to be pedophiles may need to go through this same background check for reasons outside the religion; according to the website listed above, a person goes through this check if their secular work or volunteer activity brings them into any contact with a child, such as with teachers, coaches, and the like. Potential employers may be referencing this background check to protect the children in their care, but they will also come up empty, because Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t report their own known cases of pedophilia. This puts other children in danger because those employers may unknowingly and unwittingly hire a pedophile, based on this lack of information in the WWCC database.

This is something that Barrister Stewart also noted and which I bring out in this post, when he pointedly told an elder that, even when Jehovah’s Witnesses are not satisfied that a pedophile will not re-offend, they still don’t call the police, asking, “You don’t take into consideration, do you, how people outside of the church might be kept safe from such a person?

Failing to report these crimes to the persons responsible for this database shows their obscene lack of concern, as these pedophiles could very well be hired by schools, youth detention centers, sporting leagues, etc., and the molesters could then have even more unfettered access to vulnerable children. Interesting that Jehovah’s Witnesses often say that they are a “loving” religion and they “love their neighbors”:

Second, Jesus said: “You must love your neighbor as yourself.” (Verse 31; Leviticus 19:18) Love of God and love of neighbor are really inseparable. The second is a by-product of the first. (1 John 4:20, 21) If we love our neighbors as ourselves, we will treat them the way we want them to treat us. (Matthew 7:12) We thereby show that we love the God who made us—and them—in his image.—Genesis 1:26.
~ March 1, 2013, Watchtower

Despite their words, this love doesn’t seem to extend far enough to reasonably protect their neighbors’ children from the risk of sexual molestation by one of their own.

Access to Children

Consider too the entire purpose of this check; it’s to legally restrict people who are a risk to children from coming into contact with them and making them victims of their abuse, even in their church. Jehovah’s Witnesses have failed miserably to understand this danger; as brought out in the Pedophilia category of this site and the post mentioned above, they refuse to remove someone from the congregation unless there is a second witness to child sexual abuse, and even then, they’ve been known to dismiss such testimony and welcome predators back to the church after a short excommunication. This means that these ones have access to children in the congregation and when they go to people’s homes for their preaching work and bible studies, something that would no doubt be limited by law if these molesters didn’t pass this check.

Yet, Jehovah’s Witnesses boast that they comply with this check while at the same time, as Barrister Stewart said, undermine its efficacy (intended result) by not providing the same reports that others are expected to supply.

Property Over Children

10945541_929201600459877_8775824143822112687_nTheir bold hypocrisy aside, it’s this overwhelming and systemic lack of concern for children that is the real problem. We’re not talking about checking someone’s credit to see how well they handle money, or checking a criminal record to note if they would be a risk for stealing funds or vandalizing property. We’re also not talking about reporting damage to a building, as elders are directed to do so in the above instructions.

We are talking about protecting children, all children, from vicious cases of rape and sexual molestation. Jehovah’s Witnesses make hollow gestures at doing this by having elders go through this WWCC before their appointment, but then purposely suppress information meant to be used in this same check. As long as they appear to be clean, law-abiding citizens with no child abuser under their roof, that’s all that matters. Actual child abuse itself is of no consequence to them, so it would seem.

*** ***

Please share via social media below.

Advertisements

6 replies »

  1. When you study sexual trauma and how it splits and compartmentalizes our brains — it is really the very best method to traumatize and break down the ability to think for self. Being in a state as such, the fear and coercion tactics enhance the already split brain and last a lifetime (unless deprogrammed) and they become willling slaves, not of their own free will. It is on the same level as the elitist kabal and their sick and twisted incest and pedophilia within their families. This is an epidemic on a global scale. Research MK Ultra mind control. (monarch butterfly is one program and you see a butterfly on sooo much of the new childrens propoganda from the borg). Cathy O’Brien has some fabulous videos on her mind control due to sexual molestation, that can help everyone appreciate the relm of how deep this goes within our society. The WA owners are part of a very secret society of sick and twisted individuals with an agenda. They love pedophiles!!

  2. What I find so odd, is that there is such a triple standard of how they deal with any sexual matters; if it is “fornication” or “adultery” a person can be kicked out based on a whisper, no 2nd witness needed here, but for child abuse – they will break every law and their own neck in an effort to hide it so completely and even allow the accused to wander freely to continue abusing – all with a blind eye to them. I am at a loss to understand this sick mentality. I honestly hope the ARC will secure monetary punishment against the elders that testified – well, the whole group from Australia would be great. But in usual JW fashion, JWs responded to the Commission, that in essence, they have no intention of changing a single thing. Why are these demented freaks allowed to lead authorities by the nose and suffer not a single consequence of their immoral and law-breaking practices??

    • And I bring out in this post, a woman claims to be raped and the elders will decide that for themselves based on her “mental disposition,” circumstances around the incident, and if she delayed reporting. No two witnesses needed to decide that she wasn’t raped but fornicated, and she’s disfellowshipped. But do they “discern” if a child has been raped? No, for that they need another witness and even then, they dismiss that testimony like they did with the one victim whose 3 sisters were raped, whose mother said they were molested, and whose father confessed to molesting her. I think it’s a sick love of power; they have the power to disfellowship “fornicators” and love the power of telling children “screw you, we’re not going to help.” Demented freaks sums it up nicely.

      • Thousands of observations of how JWs use “disfellowshipping” proves exactly what you say, Alex; the ONLY time they demand the two-witness rules is when it is a matter of child abuse. Freaking hypocrites….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s