Children

Watchtower Illustration Betrays Their Own Demand for Two Witnesses to Child Sex Abuse

Jehovah’s Witnesses have a very harsh “two witness” policy that they apply to allegations of child sex abuse in the religion. A victim of this abuse must have a witness to the occurrence before elders will remove an alleged offender from the congregation.

There are many legitimate criticisms against this policy, including the blatant hypocrisy of Jehovah’s Witnesses in picking and choosing when they apply this rule, something supposedly required by the bible for all accusations of misconduct, but which Watchtower gladly sets aside when they so desire:

One of the more obvious criticisms is that there is rarely, if ever, a second witness to the crime of child molestation.

Their Own Illustration Betrays This “Requirement”

The Watchtower’s book, “Learn From the Great Teacher,” is meant to be a type of study or lesson book for children, covering a range of JW doctrine and life lessons based on the life of Jesus.

In one chapter of the book, “How Jesus Was Protected,” the information discusses what a child should do if someone were to attempt to touch them inappropriately.

I do give the writers of the book credit for at least attempting to address child sexual abuse, and for attempting to empower children to resist such abuse. However, the illustration they used in this story betrays Watchtower’s own stubborn insistence on this horrific “two witness” policy of theirs:

This picture is not inaccurate; it shows a typical scenario of child sexual abuse, with an adult, by themselves, ready to force themselves on a child.

Because it’s not inaccurate, however, it also shows the gross shortsightedness of Watchtower’s “two witness” rule. There is no other adult in this illustration, not even another child, who can act as that needed second witness, the one that Watchtower demands a child produce before putting an alleged pedophile out of the congregation.

Obviously Watchtower knows that there is rarely a second witness to this type of abuse, otherwise they would have put another person in this illustration, or they would have depicted a scenario of child sexual abuse in a different context (i.e., in a school with other students nearby, at a sleepover with other children present, etc.).

Yet, when their own artists were tasked with depicting what they felt would be a good representation of potential child sexual abuse, it probably didn’t even occur to them to add another person, that “second witness” to this abuse.

The hypocrisy of Watchtower and local elders in congregations of Jehovah’s Witnesses picking and choosing when they apply this “two witness” rule is disturbing and sickening enough; the rule itself is an obscenity all on its own. However, this illustration alone proves that Watchtower writers know a child can rarely, if ever, provide a witness to their own abuse.

Despite this knowledge, they stubbornly “double down” on that rule, ignoring their own hypocrisy in when they pick and choose to apply it, ignoring their own subtle admission that it’s impossible to apply in cases of child sex abuse, and continuing to abandon children to these horrific abuses.

*** ***

Please share via social media below.

Advertisements

Categories: Children, Hypocrisy, Pedophilia

6 replies »

  1. Very simple, a crime is to be reported, or if your not involved have nothing to do with the situation and let the people involved take it to the authorities

  2. It is a shame that JWs allow its to happen and then call themselves the true religion. They are sick headed to not protect their children from abusers like these and have ones be a part of their worship. Religionists what they call Christendom at lease are starting to go by the law and turn ones over to the authorities. I’m sure that they God would want to do what is right. I would take their private parts off them with a sign saying “Child Abuser” for the rest of their life in shame. Letting the public know what they are then stone them to death like in ancient times.
    It’s just as bad as raping a women but put the abuser in a cage with women that been raped for an hour and do what they want to. If they are alive afterwards then walk or crawl away like nothing has happened. I’m sure that God would approve of it

  3. Besides, the Circuit Overseers in our area take the lead to slander innocent members of the organisation, causing great damage to their spirituality and their mentality. What a bad example set by them! They are on the road to ruin.

  4. Yes, they do pick and choose when to apply the 2 witness rule. The Shepherd book outlines that only ‘strong circumstantial evidence’ is required to form a judicial committee in the case where for instance a male JW arrives at a female’s home in the evening and the car remains there overnight. Not even one witness has observed a ‘forbidden’ act take place in this instance, yet it’s enough to take judicial action.

    • They repeated that in the July 2018 Watchtower, which I brought out in the video above. They are also told to use “discernment” if a woman claims to have been raped, no two witnesses needed to say it wasn’t rape. Sickening hypocrisies.

  5. you will need a camera and a mic in that rag doll , that’s your 2nd witness , just report the abuse right a way ,so they can DNA test ,that also is the second witness DNA , BUT YOU MUST REPORT , PARENTS start believing your children ,Don’t cover up for this corporation , its your duty to protect them from harm, and from cults. stop the insanity !!! enough already .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.